The Hagerstown (Md.) City Council on Tuesday voted to approve expansion of the Heart of the Civil War Heritage Area. With so many local economies having been rocked by the loss in tourism due to the coronavirus, the city was looking for ways to replace some of that revenue. Hagerstown is home to some significant sites from the Civil War. WDVM article
Wednesday, January 27, 2021
Thursday, January 21, 2021
Rebounding after arson fire: CSS Chattahoochee engines have been conserved, are now inside National Civil War Naval Museum
[Updated Jan. 27]
Curator Jeff Seymour, in a video posted last month to YouTube, gave a brief description of an ongoing conservation project involving the hybrid Confederate gunboat and the large ironclad CSS Jackson.
“This is a rare example of a steam engine … that still survives from the time period,” Seymour said of the Chattahoochee’s power system, which was built in Columbus and shipped downstream to Saffold, about 10 miles north of the Florida border, where the wooden boat was built.
Remains of the Jackson and the twin-screw Chattahoochee are the star exhibits of the museum and are inside the main building. Both were lost in April 1865 at war’s end -- the Jackson set afire by Federal captors and the Chattahoochee scuttled by its own crew. Neither vessel fired upon the enemy in their relatively short history. They were recovered from the Chattahoochee River in the 1960s.
For
20 years, the Chattahoochee piston heads and the locally made Jackson’s fantail
were kept in a padlocked and fenced pole barn about 100 yards from the museum,
awaiting funds that would make it possible to conserve and display them. A June
1, 2020, fire destroyed modern vessels and damaged the fantail’s wood.
The Chattahoochee’s wrought iron and cast iron engines,
the iron plates from the Jackson’s armor and the iron plating to the fantail
survived, though they were exposed to the thermal heat.
![]() |
| CSS Muscogee, later dubbed Jackson (Wikipedia) |
| The Jackson's fantail in 2019 (Picket photo) |
A $10,000 reward was offered
and federal agents were brought in to assist local authorities in the investigation.
Columbus Fire Marshal Ricky
Shores recently told the Picket that the investigation is closed.
“However, if new information becomes available we will
evaluate the status of the case,” he wrote in an email. “In short, we just
don’t have anything to (pursue) at this point …No one has been charged as of
yet.”
| A view of the pole barn remains in January 2021 (Picket photo) |
The venue has a web page that has kept the public up on the conservation of the engines and fantail.
Museum Executive Director Holly Wait said in an email, "The iron plating (and the wood) of the fantail were cleaned and conserved and are now inside the Museum. However, because of the fire the fantail was dismantled piece by piece. We await more grant funding to build crates for the wood and recreate the iron fantail."
| Conserved fantail plates in lower crates at left (NCWNM photo) |
| Charred remnants of fantail wood are on display (NCWNM photo) |
Seymour, director of history and collections at the museum, wrote: “Since the fantail was upside down, the wooden structure was the first part to receive attention. Each beam was documented and carefully removed for conservation work. Using a process called photogrammetry, the archaeologists took hundreds of images of each layer in order to better understand the structure.
“As each level emerged, we were able to see elements of this
vessel that no one has seen since 1864. As each level surfaced, several
questions about how the Jackson was constructed were answered,
but many more questions developed. Simply, this structure is much more complex
than we thought heading into this project."
| CSS Chattahoochee engines in early 2019 before fire (Picket photo) |
The
Picket was allowed inside the padlocked
and fenced shed in early 2019, with Seymour detailing the artifacts and their
importance when it comes to understanding design and construction.
![]() |
| Remnants of the shed after the fire (Columbus Fire and EMS) |
As for the Jackson armor still stored in the pole barn, Wait said the pieces will be conserved when funding allows.
"Visitors were understandably upset about the arson but delighted that the conservation project went ahead and that the pieces are inside," she wrote about the engine and fantail. "We await more funding to complete the larger exhibition that ties all this together."
Sunday, January 17, 2021
New 3D experience showcases Gettysburg landmarks as you've never seen them. Virtual tours of homes are 'up-close and personal'
![]() |
| Virtual tour of two-room home of Lydia Leister (NPS images) |
Gettysburg National Military Park recently launched a page that features three sites related to
the Civil War and the house and show barn at Eisenhower National Historic Site.
“We are
thrilled to be able to bring these 3D tours to our visitors. Thanks to this new
technology, these historic buildings can be experienced and enjoyed by all our
visitors at any time,” Gettysburg Superintendent Steven D. Sims said in a statement. “These amazing tours put the visitor in control of an up-close and
personal experience with the stories of each of these structures.”
Each page has
a virtual walk-through of the structure and a second smaller image that
provides audio. Viewers can choose which floor to look at, obtain a 3D cutaway image of the entire structure and view floor plans. The tours are available for home computers, smartphones or
virtual reality headsets, park officials said.
Here are
details on the three homes that date to the July 1863 battle in southern
Pennsylvania, as provided by the park. Click each name for a link.
Adam Brian (Bryan) farm (above): The free black man lived on this 12-acre farm with his wife, Elizabeth, and two children. He purchased the land in 1857, grew wheat, barley and hay, and tended a small apple and peach orchard. Afraid of being captured and sold into slavery, Brian and his family left their home when Confederate troops entered Pennsylvania. Following the battle, they returned to find their home riddled with bullet holes, windows smashed, and furniture thrown about the yard. The crops and orchard were ruined, and their farm fields a graveyard for hastily buried soldiers. Brian repaired his home, replaced his fences, and farmed his land until 1869, when he moved to town and worked at a local hotel.
Lydia Leister house (above): Union Maj. Gen. George G. Meade made the two-room home headquarters during the battle.Late in the evening of July 2, Meade held a council of war in this house to decide if the army should stay and hold their hard-fought high ground or abandon their position.The artillery bombardment prior to Pickett's Charge on July 3 caused considerable damage to the house.
![]() |
| Model of wartime Gettysburg at Wills house |
It currently is closed because of the coronavirus pandemic.
Sunday, January 10, 2021
Where 'Fighting Joe' Wheeler whupped 'em: A quick revisit to the Brown's Mill cavalry battlefield outside Atlanta
![]() |
| Scenes from Brown's Mill (All park photos by Civil War Picket) |
But the area
also is known for a cavalry clash that ended in a disaster for Federal forces.
I had not visited the 200-acre, county-operated site in several years. The Brown’s Mill park includes a few interpretive signs, walking and bike trails and a parade field suitable for re-enactments. (The Picket wrote about the battle and the opening of the park in these articles from 2011 and 2013.)
My focus this visit was a June 1908 monument remembering the only battle fought in Coweta County. Erected by the United Daughters of the Confederacy, it pays tribute to cavalrymen under the command of Lt. Gen. Joseph “Fighting Joe” Wheeler.
In recent
years, I have read about how often Union Maj. Gen. William Sherman’s Atlanta Campaign was stymied by the performance of his cavalry.
Notwithstanding Brig. Gen. Kenner Garrard's success during a July 1864 raid east of
Atlanta, historians and others have pointed out that Sherman did not have much
confidence in his top cavalry division commanders. They lacked aggressiveness
and competence and often suffered from self-doubt. And, observers say, Sherman
was often ineffective in using his troopers to meet objectives.
Charlie
Crawford, president of the Georgia Battlefields Association, last year told me
that Garrard may have been the best division chief – when compared to Edward
McCook, Judson Kilpatrick and George Stoneman -- “but that’s not saying much.”
McCook (left) suffered ignominy at Brown’s Mill on July 30, 1864.
Sherman had tasked McCook and Maj. Gen. Stoneman with cutting vital railroads south of Atlanta so that he would not have to engage in a prolonged siege of Atlanta. McCook, after damaging some track at Lovejoy Station, hoped to rendezvous with Stoneman. He had nearly 3,000 men under his command.
But Stoneman had chosen to ride toward Macon, with the hope of reaching the large Confederate prison at Andersonville to the south.
With no rendezvous, McCook
hurried toward the Chattahoochee River and Federal lines to the
north. Wheeler (right), hot on the Union cavalry's trail, pursued them from Newnan and ambushed the exhausted forces at Brown's Mill.
A report written for the park's master plan describes the dismounted fighting and this detail:
"As Major Root and the 8th Iowa formed for the charge, Wheeler renewed the assault on McCook’s right. 'Follow me! My brave men!' he commanded. A wild Rebel yell answered the little general as he led his Texans and Tennesseans back into the fight. At the same time, 'Sul' Ross’s Texas brigade came up on their right, dismounted, and joined the fight.”
The attack overwhelmed McCook's flank.
“Wheeler had his best day as a soldier,” said Crawford. “This is where McCook lost control and was broken up.” McCook held a brief council of war, suggesting the force surrender. Other officers decided to fight and McCook basically gave up command. It was every man for himself then, with separate columns attempting to break out from the trap.
Men fled toward the river and more than 1,200 were taken prisoner over the new few days (the monument mistakenly has a much lower figure). Some men, including an officer naked except for his hat, managed to swim or take a few ferries to safety.
A day later, Stoneman was defeated and captured at the Battle of Sunshine Creek.
The Union cavalry clearly failed to attain its goal in the McCook-Stoneman raid, forcing Sherman to change tactics and besiege Atlanta and use infantry at Jonesboro, wrote historian David Evans in his book “Sherman’s Horsemen."
Brown's Mill was one of few Confederate victories during the Atlanta Campaign. The fighting at Brown's Mill cost McCook about 100 killed and wounded, while Wheeler's casualties probably numbered less than 50, according to Evans.
The Coweta County park is along Millard Farmer Road hear the intersection with Old Corinth Road. It was the scene of much of the heaviest fighting.
An interpretive panel near the monument details some of the units involved at Brown’s Mill.
Monday, January 4, 2021
Protection of portion of Civil War battlefield in Alabama will allow further study of African-American troops who helped secure victory
![]() |
| Colorized Harper's Weekly illustration of assault on Fort Blakeley |
On the same day Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered his Army of Northern Virginia at Appomattox -- April 9, 1865 -- the 73rd and eight other USCT regiments played a major part in the overrunning and surrender of Fort Blakeley, a Rebel bastion east of Mobile, Ala.
Snaer fell with a severe wound to the foot during the fierce attack, which was over in a half hour.
“He refused to sheathe
his sword or to be carried off the field,” wrote Colonel Henry C. Merriam, the 73rd’s commander. “No
braver officer has honored any flag.”
The combined Federal infantry and naval victory was the last such operation of the war. The courage of 5,000 African-American troops who fought at Fort Blakeley has since been the subject of articles and research.
![]() |
| A portion of the battlefield is in the parcel (The Conservation Fund) |
Last month, The Conservation Fund, American Battlefield Trust
and the University of South Alabama (USA) announced the long-term protection of 60 acres
in the battlefield. The conservation easement was funded by a National Park
Service grant of $293,000.
About 40 percent of the 2,000-acre battlefield already was owned by the state,
much of it within Historic Blakeley State Park, which is north of Spanish Fort.
“However, what is arguably the most significant
quarter of the battle site, where U.S. Colored Troops overran Confederate
defenses in a raging assault, was unprotected until now,” the groups said
in a statement. “The 60-acre property known as Blakeley Bluff is expected to
contain valuable archaeological data related to this African American
experience. The protection of this land will allow USA greater opportunities
for archaeological digs, historical research and preservation of the battle
site’s rich history.”
Mike Bunn, director of operations at the state park, which abuts the 60-acre parcel (shaded orange area in map at left), told the Picket that the newly protected land contains artillery positions, a portion of Confederate Redoubt 3 and part of the line between Redoubt 3 and Redoubt 2.
USCT troops
were posted in an area fronting Redoubts 1 and 2 -- the northernmost
Confederate fortifications along the line at Fort Blakeley -- during the weeklong
siege. The 73rd planted a flag after it took Redoubt 2, one of nine
such fortifications put up by Rebel troops. USCT units focused on Redoubts 1, 2
and 3 in the attack. Some of that land is now private property.
Bunn, writing last year for the Blue and Gray Education Society, said about 30 black soldiers
were killed and nearly 150 wounded in the assault, a significant portion of nearly 400
casualties during the entirety of operations, which resulted in the largest
Civil War battle in Alabama. White officers extolled the bravery of the
regiments, comprised mostly of formerly enslaved men.
“Greater
gallantry than was shown by officers and men could hardly be desired,” wrote
Brig. Gen. Christopher Columbus Andrews. “The (troops) were burning with an
impulse to do honor to their race, and rushed forward with intense enthusiasm,
in face of a terrible fire.”
There's natural beauty in an historic area
While the
state park has been the subject of archaeological digs over the years, little
has been done on the 60 acres, which are owned by The Conservation Fund and
will be managed by USA.
![]() |
| Blakely bluff as seen from the Tensaw River (The Conservation Fund) |
The land is
part of a fragile ecosystem, featuring diverse plant life, tall bluffs,
hardwood ravines and black water swamps, according to The Conservation Fund. Fort
Blakeley was built along the Tensaw River, which flows south into the Apalachee
River and Mobile Bay.
“The
archaeological excavations and research that USA plans to do on this property
has the potential to enhance what we know about the USCT that fought there,”
Val Keefer of The Conservation Fund told the Picket.
Philip J. Carr, a professor of anthropology at the university, said the conservation easement “will allow for a systematic exploration of
the property to better understand the cultural resources that are there, both
prehistoric and historic. USA students will be involved in systematic
archaeological survey of the property at some point in the future.”
![]() |
| Click this Mobile campaign map to enlarge (Library of Congress) |
Although Union Adm. David Farragut has bottled up Mobile in the summer of 1864, it remained in Confederate hands.
The arrival of additional Federal troops in early 1865 brought about the campaign to take Fort Blakeley, Spanish Fort and other guardians east of Mobile, a vital transportation and supply center.
“There are good elevations around here,” Bunn told the Picket in 2017. “If you want to take Mobile the easiest route would be via the eastern shore … and come from the north.”
Confederate commanders used soldiers and slaves to build the
earthen fortifications. Fort Blakeley was built following designs typical for a
defense against a ground attack. It was commanded by Brig. Gen. St. John
R. Liddell (left).
Union troops, a third of which were USCT regiments, laid
siege of Blakeley for about a week.
![]() |
| Remains of Rebel fortifications at Fort Blakeley (Historic Blakeley SP) |
About 180,000 men, most of them former slaves but others free men of color, served in the US Colored Troops in the last few years of the conflict. While they were often relegated to guard duty, supply work or manual labor, they fought at Port Hudson, La., Petersburg, Va., and Fort Blakeley, among a few other battles.
In his Blue & Gray article, Bunn writes: “The USCT units at Blakeley marched
there from Pensacola as a division of troops led by Gen. Frederick Steele. They
were to join other forces under Gen. Edward S. Canby for a move against Mobile.
Brig. Gen. John P. Hawkins held overall command of the division, which he
organized into three brigades led by Gen. William A. Pile, Col. Hiram Scofield,
and Col. Charles W. Drew. USCT units including the 47th, 48th, 50th, 51st,
68th, 73rd, 76th 82nd, and 86th Infantries comprised these brigades. The
majority of these men had enlisted in Louisiana, with one unit having formed in
Missouri.”
The USCT
regiments held the right flank of the Union line.
The two sides exchanged artillery and gunfire during the
siege. The afternoon of April 9 was chosen for a massive assault on the Rebel
defenses. Nearly 16,000 blue-clad warriors were up against 3,500 Confederates, half
of whom were veteran troops.
![]() |
| Library of Congress map showing opposing lines in April 1865. USCT units were at far right (north end). They focused on Redoubts 1, 2, 3 (click to enlarge) |
A portion of the Black regiments were engaged in
reconnaissance of a Rebel position but were pinned down in a firefight until
the general assault.
“They were one of the first units heavily engaged that afternoon,” Bunn said.
The Iron Brigader website also offers details of the battle and
reports by Federal officers. Col. Scofield provided vivid detail about the 47,
50th and 51st regiments: “The command moved with a yell through the abatis
and over torpedoes (mines), several of which exploded, driving the rebels from
their works and guns, and in conjunction with the regiments of the other
brigades which entered the works almost simultaneously, captured a large number
of prisoners.”
By then Rebel
gun emplacements had been overrun, the Iron Brigader says.
![]() |
| Col. Hiram Scofield |
Bunn writes for the Blue and the Gray that the attack was “a short but bitter affair, featuring a
grand, open-field charge through a storm of artillery and small arms fire and
isolated pockets of fighting all across the 3-mile line. By 6:15 p.m. the last
shots of the battle had been fired, and Fort Blakeley lay in the possession of
the victorious Union Army. During the battle, USCT units captured over 200 men
and several pieces of artillery and sustained some of the heaviest casualties
of any unit engaged.”
Early in the battle, USCT troops heard
racial epithets uttered by Confederate troops, but they were not swayed from
their intention of proving themselves. Once they reached the Rebel lines,
close-quarters combat briefly raged before the surrender.
“Allegations that some Confederates were shot even after they
surrendered to USCT troops surfaced almost immediately after the battle and the
truth of what happened in its chaotic last moments continue to be the subject
of research and speculation today,” Bunn wrote in the Encyclopedia of Alabama.
“Available evidence indicates some Union soldiers indeed may have fired on
Confederates who had surrendered, but there was no large-scale massacre.”
![]() |
| Redoubt #4 (Courtesy of Historic Blakeley State Park) |
New opportunity to interpret battle
With the fall of Spanish Fort and Fort Blakely, Mobile could
no longer be defended; Federal troops occupied the city on April 12. The war
was essentially over by that point.
Capt. Snaer, considered a free person of color in New Orleans upon his joining the Louisiana Native Guards in 1862, spent six days in a field hospital after his wounding at Fort Blakeley. He mustered out in November 1865. After the war, he moved to California and died there in 1917, at age 75.
The bravery
of Snaer and his comrades at Blakeley came before American-Americans attained
full citizenship and civil rights. Now their legacy can be further explored on
the protected site.
“Because of the landscape’s history,
farming on the old battlefields was limited and the distinctive soils held
impressions for centuries,” The Conservation Fund says of the battlefield. “Trenches, gun
emplacements, batteries and other marks of battle are still prominent and
intact, providing opportunities for archaeological digging, data collecting and
vivid interpretation of the often-untold history of these troops.”

























