Kennesaw Mountain staff confirmed names of mountains on a map. Now, the Library of Congress is crediting drawing to Theodore Davis, rather than Alfred Waud

A map of the Kennesaw Mountain battlefield shows Rebel guns (Library of Congress)

An effort by the Library of Congress to identify mountains in a sketch depicting Confederate artillery positions at the Kennesaw Mountain battlefield has concluded with the institution changing the attribution for the drawing from Alfred R. Waud to Theodore R. Davis.

The unsigned and undated map of the Georgia battlefield was among many Civil War drawings donated to the library more than a century ago by the estate of famed financier J.P. Morgan. It was long attributed to Waud, the legendary artist-journalist who followed the Army of the Potomac in Virginia.

But the LOC’s Kara Chittenden, senior cataloging specialist with the Prints & Photographs Division, and Sara Duke, curator of Popular and Applied Graphics, told the Picket that the library is changing the catalog reference to the map as likely belonging to Davis (right), another famous Civil War illustrator.

Waud was in Virginia in June and July 1864, creating dramatic scenes from Cold Harbor and Petersburg while Davis was with Sherman’s armies during much of the Atlanta Campaign, including the Battle of Kennesaw Mountain on June 27, 1864. His employer, Harper’s Weekly, did not publish the sketch, according to the LOC.

Waud did travel to Georgia after the Civil War to make illustrations for a book and other publications. He died in nearby Marietta in 1891.

Chittenden in mid-November reached out to Kennesaw Mountain National Battlefield Park with a question. An outside researcher wanted an addition to the sketch’s catalog, but the federal library needed to verify that information.

Box of index cards showing locations of units at Kennesaw (Jake Boling/NPS)

“The researcher believes that the map depicts Kennesaw Mountain battlefield, with Pigeon Hill on the left, Little Kennesaw Mtn in the center and Big Kennesaw Mtn on the right. Unfortunately, there is very little information on the map to confirm this. Would you be able to verify this information?” Chittenden wrote to the park.

The inquiry was picked up by Jake Boling, a park ranger and education coordinator at the park.

Boling used valuable old-school technology to confirm the location of the mountains: Emmet Nichols, a ranger at Kennesaw Mountain in the 1970s and 1980s, worked from official records to pinpoint the locations of Union and Confederate positions, including those brimming with artillery. Nichols put the information on large index cards. The folders, which included the names of units on each mountain, have been kept in a large box.

These names in the park's archives are shown on the LOC map (Jake Boling/NPS)

While the Library of Congress drawing itself does not label the mountains, the artillery positions are labeled with the names of their commanders.

“Working here as long as I have, I recognized these names,” Boling said in a recent phone call.

The batteries were under the command of Confederate Maj. George S. Storrs.

At left, on Pigeon Hill, are Parrott guns of J.A. Hoskins’ Mississippi battery. Deployed at Little Kennesaw are more Hoskins Parrotts and Napoleon guns belonging to Capt. John Ward’s Alabama battery and Capt. Henry Guibor’s Missouri battery. At far right of the sketch are siege guns.

Detail from the Library of Congress map of Pigeon Hill (left) and Little Kennesaw

“The guns did move. I don’t think all of these were in these positions all at once,” Boling said.

The drawing shows the profile of mountains as they would be seen from Marietta, just to the southeast.

Boling says Confederate Maj. Gen. William Loring, who commanded a corps during the Atlanta Campaign, may have been consulted for the battery locations. When that occurred is uncertain.

Chittenden added the names of the mountains to the catalog and said the library will now be attributing the map and a few other Kennesaw Mountain sketches to Davis.

“The former attribution to Alfred Waud (left) is unlikely because Waud was not at this battle,” the updated catalog will say of the mountains drawing, which it says was created in 1864.

It’s impossible, without a signature, to know for sure who made the map. But there can be clues.

“I’m afraid there isn’t enough evidence on the map to know that Davis drew it and not a soldier or other eyewitness who drew it and gave it to him,” said Duke of the Library of Congress. “As you can see, modern databases have made it easier for us to change attribution of art and learn the whereabouts of the artists who recorded the Civil War for illustrated weeklies."

Duke told the Picket when she looked at copies of Harper’s Weekly for Kennesaw, the only artist represented was Davis.

“When I cataloged the collection in 1991, I worked with a pencil, sheets of paper and bound editions of Harper’s Weekly, Frank Leslie’s, and the New York Illustrated News. Almost all of the drawings were attributed to Waud when I arrived. I was able to verify attributions to other artists using the bound volumes. What I could not do in the time allotted, was track dates and movements with a pencil and paper. Now, it is easier to see how artists moved with the armies. As databases improve, it takes much less time to verify information, but a lot more time to change the cataloging.”

The Picket reached out to Boling about the new Davis attribution, but he was away from the office.

When asked for comment, Kennesaw Mountain park ranger Ray Hamel said: "If you feel the new information is reflective of accurate scholarship, I think it's safe to say the credit can go to Davis."

Folders in the park's collection show Storrs' batteries (Jake Boling/NPS)

The Picket learned about the drawing from a Facebook post by the park about the collaboration with the Library of Congress. The post said the sketch “matches up almost perfectly with the park's own records.” (At the time of our call, Boling and I understood the drawing to have been done by Waud.)

Chittenden said the public -- should they want to propose changes or additions to an image description -- can reach out to the Library of Congress’ Prints and Photographs page via its “Ask a Librarian” form. “Once we receive a request to update a catalog record, we try to verify the information before making any changes.”

Boling said he and fellow park staffers try to be transparent to the public about where they get their information. He points out that most of the visitors to the popular site come for recreation and do not realize the park also tells the history of the area.

“We try to set the standard for accurate, unbiased information, and research opportunities and resources.”

Colorado unit that fought Rebels and Indians during the Civil War put out a newspaper. The Library of Congress now has a rare complete set

A complete set of Soldier's Letter (Shawn Miller, Library of Congress)

The Library of Congress (LOC) has acquired extremely rare editions of a soldier-produced newspaper describing the actions of the Second Colorado Cavalry against Confederate guerrillas and troops in Kansas and Missouri and, later in the war, Native American fighters.

The bound copy of the full print run of Soldier’s Letter was among only a few complete sets of 50 editions to survive the war, the library said in a late December post about the acquisition. The unofficial camp newspaper was produced 1864-1865 in Kansas City, Mo., and Fort Riley, Kan.

Pvt. Oliver Wallace served as editor, working from contributions by other enlisted men and wives. Soldier’s Letter included poems, regiment history, rosters, letters to the editor and features about camp life, according to the American Antiquarian Society. (Colorado, by the way, was a territory during the Civil War, but this unit fought in the Midwest).

“Though there is a long-standing national obsession with the Civil War, regimental newspapers never quite caught on as something to be preserved,” wrote Neely Tucker in the LOC blog post.

“More than 200 such papers in at least 32 states printed at least one edition, according to historian Earle Lutz, but they had mostly vanished by the time he surveyed the nation’s libraries, museums and major private collections in the early 1950s.”

(From left) Lt. Col. Theodore Dodd, Col. James H. Ford and Pvt. William Waggoner (WCNB)

The LOC acquired the volume from a dealer in rare manuscripts. The volume was given to regimental commander James Hobart Ford after the Civil War as a memento.

The editions of the newspaper -- which each cost 10 cents -- are printed in pulp stock. Three pages in each edition included news, rumors, jokes and histories of the regiment, which was formed in 1863. The fourth page was left blank for soldiers to write letters or notes to family or friends. The troopers then mailed the pages home.

“Much of the war was over by the time Wallace started his paper, but he and his unnamed correspondents did note Lincoln’s assassination, accounts of skirmishes and the general tenor of the last days of the Confederacy,” wrote Tucker, who manages the LOC blog.

“The rebels have taken to smuggling in bacon past the blockage,” a short item noted in one edition of the anti-slavery camp newspaper. “The evidences multiply that they are on their last legs.”

Final issue sums up unit's history and number of complete editions (Library of Congress)

Another soldier wrote:

“Dear Mother:
Nothing of interest has transpired since I sent you the last two copies of the Soldiers Letter. We are still staying in Mo and will probably remain here some time. My health is good first rate. Plenty of fun Plenty to eat and nothing to do Capt Moses was maried [sic] last Thursday He givs [sic] a party to  night at his wives fathers you bet we will have a good time.”

The Second Colorado Cavalry was deployed  for some time in what was called the Trans-Mississippi Theater during the Civil War. Its actions included patrols, clashes and chasing Confederate Gen. Sterling Price in Missouri in 1864, engaging in multiple battles. Price's foray was a major defeat for the South.

Wilson's Creek National Battlefield in Missouri has a collection of Trans-Mississippi items in its museum, including 19 photos of Second Colorado Cavalry's soldiers (three above) and two documents, says curator Jeff Patrick.

Late in the war, the regiment was sent west to quell Indian raiders on the Santa Fe Trail and other locations. Although the Second Colorado Cavalry was not a participant in the infamous Sand Creek Massacre of Indians in 1864 that killed scores of women, children and the elderly, the Soldier’s Letter editorialized the attack was not vicious enough.

Chris Rein, who wrote a book about the regiment, said in an interview with H-Net that the unit “had a fascinating history, and operated at the nexus of the Civil War and the conquest of the American West.”

He told the Picket in an email this week that accounts such as those by the regiment are "incredibly valuable for assessing the 'unit culture' of Civil War units. Letters, diaries, memoirs, etc. give an individual perspective, but newspapers were intended to appeal to a broader readership and therefore more accurately reflect collective views."

"The paper was published during the most pivotal period of the unit’s service in the 'Burned District' along the Kansas-Missouri border and therefore provides insight into that 'counterinsurgency' campaign, as well as the flaring hostilities on the Plains. It highlights how a regiment of staunch abolitionists could, at the same time, be among the worst Indian-haters in the West," Rein told the Picket.

Chandra Miller, in a 1999 article for the Kansas Historical Society, said the men of the Second Colorado Cavalry, created the Soldier’s Letter to fight isolation, boredom and vagueness of purpose.

“In each issue the Soldier’s Letter covered topics from the history of the regiment to civilian gossip, but the bulk of its pages was dedicated to reflections on the righteousness of American governmental institutions, politics and the eradication of slavery,” Miller wrote.

The newspapers have not been transcribed and thus are not online. The only way to see the full run is by visiting the LOC in Washington, D.C., or, according to Rein, the Denver Public Library, which he says also has a complete set.

1890s infographic mapped entire war

The "History of the Civil War in the United States, 1860-1865" was published by The Comparative Synoptical Chart Company back in 1897. And while its gloriously complex form has been preserved by the Library of Congress in great detail, instructions on exactly how to read it properly seem to have been lost to time.Click the bold link and give it a try!

Gazing at the faces of the young, innocent

The Library of Congress will open a new Civil War photography exhibit April 12 to coincide with the 150th anniversary. “The Last Full Measure: Civil War Photographs from the Liljenquist Family Collection,” features 400 haunting pictures. • Article