Navy's new heritage and history museum in DC aims to be a more accessible tourist destination with Civil War and other artifacts, a conference center and retail

Conceptual drawing of the interior, subject to changes (AtkinsRéalis Group Inc.)

The new home of the National Museum of the United States Navy – which has some of the Civil War’s most-treasured naval artifacts – will feature a conference center, retail space and enhanced public access, officials announced in Washington, D.C., on Friday.

Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro and others gathered at the planned campus at Tingey Street and M Street just outside the Washington Navy Yard. Speakers said the museum will go from a traditional site to a more engaging campus, all the while ensuring the story of sailors' courage and sacrifice will continue to be told.

“It is intended to be a self-funded tourist destination that aims to intrigue, inform and inspire generations of visitors,” the Naval History and Heritage Command said in a news release.

The Navy will work with the nonprofit Navy Museum Development Foundation on construction and operation.

The news release did not indicate when the new site might open. The Picket reached out the Navy and the foundation about any plans to display Civil War artifacts, and they said any firm plans for their future have not been made.

One of several ship's models in the current Building 76 (U.S. Navy photo)

Building 76 of the current museum has been open on Saturdays only as curators and staff prepare for the new location. The “Securing the Seas” Civil War exhibit focuses on control of trade routes, the Federal blockade and technology.

Visitors have to provide ID and have limited access to the area because it is on the secure Washington Navy Yard. The new location will be outside the yard, meaning access will not be restrictive.

The main naval battles explored are New Orleans, Mobile Bay, Hampton Roads and the engagement between USS Kearsarge and Confederate commerce raider Alabama near Cherbourg, France.

Numerous items related to that clash are on display, including the shattered sternpost of the Kearsarge (below), a ship’s bell and a toilet.

Most of the objects from Alabama that were considered underwater archaeological recovery pieces have been removed from display, says Wesley Schwenk, registrar for the museum in Washington. They are retained in storage for preservation purposes. 

Items that have been on display in “Securing the Seas” include a watch bell from USS Merrimack, a Confederate frame torpedo, mustard and pepper bottles from USS Monitor, ship models, a sword belonging to Rear Adm. David D. Farragut and a 12-pounder howitzer.

A drawing on the foundation’s website appears to show an historic Navy building within the new campus.

“The new museum will also become the cornerstone of a Navy Campus based on a sustainable business model designed for long-term durability of the project,” the foundation says. “In addition to freeing up critically needed space at Washington Navy Yard, the mixed-use Campus will create opportunities for vitally needed revenue streams to support museum programs.”

The website touts the city’s “hottest neighborhood” and 22 million annual visitors to the District of Columbia.

“The new National Museum of the U.S. Navy will provide a dramatically improved opportunity for the American public to be inspired by the long history of valor and sacrifice of American sailors in the defense of our country, and to learn the vital importance of seapower to our way of life,” said NHHC director Samuel J. Cox in the news release.

Officials with the foundation cautioned the design of the museum may look very different from conceptual plans on its website.

Kristina Higgins, a public affairs officer for the Navy History and Heritage Command, said submitted design concepts are being considered.

Conceptual drawing of the interior, subject to change (AtkinsRéalis Group Inc.)

“The exhibits in the new museum will be completely researched, designed and installed from a blank slate, drawing upon community input and the very latest scholarship and interpretations in the field of U.S. Naval History,” Higgins said in an email. “To the extent that current exhibits support the interpretations designed for the new building, they may be moved.”

Officials said the museum will include items from the full breadth of naval history.

“Not every item currently on exhibit in the NMUSN will be moved on to the floor of the new museum as new galleries are designed” according to Higgins. “Some pieces may not fit with the new story being told, and therefore they will be placed in our off-exhibit collection to be used at a later date.”

Building 76 will be used as office space, conservation and storage of off-exhibit items in the short term. Long-term plans will be dependent on the needs of the Washington Navy Yard, officials said.

Cockspur lighthouse at Fort Pulaski emerges from scaffolding after months of preservation work. Here's what was done on beacon

(All photos are recent and from Fort Pulaski National Monument)

Fort Pulaski National Monument near Savannah, Ga., this week completed a five-month project aimed at protecting the small but resilient Cockspur Island Lighthouse from moisture and tides.

The 46-foot structure, built in 1855, has endured high tides, hurricanes, waves from ever-growing container ships, vandals and – for a deafening 30 hours – the April 1862 bombardment of nearby Fort Pulaski during the Civil War. 

The Union’s strategy was to put a chokehold on Southern commerce by controlling ports and coastal areas, including this area next to the Atlantic Ocean. Federal soldiers landed at Tybee Island and set about preparing for an attack on Pulaski, a brick guardian to the west.

Remarkably, the lighthouse suffered little or no damage. Crews manning 36 guns on 11 batteries stretching along the western end of Tybee likely used the lighthouse for sighting as they pounded away at the fort. The Confederate garrison, worried that exploding shells might reach munitions, surrendered within a day.

Louvered transoms on door, windows allow ventilation

The park over the years has undertaken work aimed at protecting the beacon. The Picket has communicated with Emily Forlenza, exhibits specialist and acting facility operations specialist at Fort Pulaski National Monument, about the project. Here are her emailed responses to questions, edited for brevity.

Q. Would you mind briefly summarizing all the work was done?

A. For this project, the masonry tower, stairs, keel, window and door openings, and interior of the Cockspur Island Lighthouse were cleaned, chiseled and repointed. These efforts were undertaken due to the damage that this structure sustained from tidal action. The mortar that was used was a match to what we believe was used historically, based on lab testing, material sampling, and test patches used in various areas. Most of the efforts for masonry repointing took place on the exterior of the structure, as that is where the most wind and water action is seen. The interior masonry also saw this repair work as well, but it was not as extensive. Additionally, the door and windows on the structure were replaced using materials and a configuration that are believed to be the configuration and material of the original fixtures. The only update to these new additions was to add a louvered transom instead of a fanlight above the door and windows. This was done to allow for passive ventilation through the structure, since it is closed most of the year due to its remote location. In total, we replaced one entry door and transom, three 6-light windows with transoms, and two porthole windows. 

Q. In October, you mentioned work “toward getting the light back on.” What do you mean?

A. Since this lighthouse is located in a major shipping channel, we want to make sure that no vessel would confuse this with an active aid to navigation (ATON.) We are planning to work closely with the Coast Guard to get the light back up in the lighthouse, facing out in the direction where ships will not be able to confuse their navigation. We are hoping this will come shortly, within the next few months. (The lighthouse was last used as a lighted beacon in 1909)

Q. Did anything require total or partial replacement?

A. The door and windows all required total replacement. We did not have a functional door at all, and what was in place for all of the openings was neither original nor historic. 

Q. What painting was done?

A. The cupola of the lighthouse was painted with a rust reformer and black metal paint in order to restore its appearance. The old cupola is located in front of the visitor center of Fort Pulaski, having been removed due to its state of deterioration in 1995. (See comments section below for why exterior of lighthouse was not painted)

Q. Will the lighthouse remain closed to the public?

A. This is a topic of discussion among Fort Pulaski staff, but for the foreseeable future it will remain closed.  

Q. How did the lighthouse fare during the recent super high tides? I know higher water levels have been of concern for a time.

A. The lighthouse itself held up very well, as she always does. None of our new repair work showed any sign of failure, and the new door and windows we put on look as good as they did the day we put them on.

Q. How will you regulate or manage moisture issues?

A. As stated above, the passive ventilation that is offered by the louvered transoms is our main mitigation against the stagnant damp air that would typically cause issues inside the structure. 

Q. You anticipated the project would cost about $150,000. Did that prove to be true?

A. Yes, we came in right around our anticipated budget. (Funding for the fabrication of the door and windows came from a grant given to the Friends of Cockspur Island Lighthouse by the Tybee Island Historical Society, which was matched by NPS Centennial Challenge funding.)

Q. Can you tell me about the replacement mortar being historically accurate? How so?

A. Historically, the mortar used for the lighthouse would have had a heavy makeup of natural cement due to its location being heavy impacted by the tides. During testing, it was determined that this was true. The park then did test patches to make sure that the mortar was going to hold up in this area. Even though the mortar was historically accurate, we still wanted to make sure that this would be the best fit for the structure. 

Q. What work was done by NPS staff and what was done by contractors?

A. The National Park Service provided all of the day labor and craft skills required to repoint the structure, paint the cupola, and install the door and windows. The door and windows were fabricated by Savannah Millworks, a local company here in Savannah. The scaffolding that was constructed around the structure was also contracted out, by Sunbelt Rentals. 

Q. Any hitches or pleasant surprises or finds during the work?

A. The most fascinating part of working with historic structures in these historic settings is coming up with unique ways to start these projects off. The planning process was the most interesting part initially, because we needed to figure out how we were going to get sturdy enough scaffolding around a structure that was surrounded by huge boulders (revetment, to protect the island from erosion) while at the same time ensuring that the structure would be protected during tidal surges from the scaffolding swaying or moving in any way. We had to figure out how best to get a crew of 5-6 people out to the lighthouse every day safety and efficiently, while factoring in tides that would change where we could get the crew on and off the island.

And probably the most unexpected hitch: the crew shared the lighthouse with a very disgruntled barn owl for about a month, before the owl decided it was time to find a new home. He did continue to torment the crew each day upon their arrival until he moved out. 

Q. Any other thoughts on the project?

A. This project gave us an incredible amount of information that we are going to be using to develop future projects for the preservation of this structure. 

Projects like these are essential for future project development. It is such a unique experience to be directly involved in work like this, and I am thankful that my crew and I were able to take part in preserving this structure for future generations. 

Click here for previous Picket coverage on the lighthouse