Francis Barlow (left) (Library of Congress) |
College
students in New England blamed politicians for not keeping the peace, thereby setting
in motion disunion, according to Kanisorn Wongsrichanalai's essay in “Children and Youth During the Civil War Era”
(NYU Press).
Their
counterparts in Virginia, meanwhile, were angry with “old fog(e)ys” who were
not eager about secession. Labeled as "lazy, immoral, and hotheaded"
the youth wanted to see Virginia restored to its glory and “progress”
furthered, even in a slave society, wrote Peter S. Carmichael in “The Last
Generation: Young Virginians in Peace, War, and Reunion” (UNC Press).
“There is a
sense that Southerners are losing power and are being forced into a minority,”
says Wongsrichanalai, assistant professor of
history at Angelo State University in San Angelo, Texas.
While few were abolitionists, Northern men firmly
believed in preserving the union.
The collision
course of ideals arrived at Sumter and birthed four long bloody years of
conflict. Hundreds of thousands of young men who believed their side was right
were mowed down.
Wongsrichanalai |
Topics
include the reasons men volunteered, the beliefs of college-educated soldiers,
small-unit cohesion and the factors that kept men fighting, even when facing
certain death or injury.
Wongsrichanalai wrote
his doctoral dissertation on what motivated college-educated New Englanders to
fight.
Young men of
that generation, he says, were taught at universities to be leaders and gentlemen.
“How can I be useful? How can I be a leader in society? If I don’t do it, who
will?” says Wongsrichanalai. Among the 48 individuals he studied were Francis
Barlow, Joshua Chamberlain, Oliver Howard and Robert Gould Shaw.
These men
from New England internalized their honor, preferring the term “character.”
“Southern
honor is about public reputation and how people in the community view you,” the
professor tells the Picket. “Northern honor is doing what is right despite what
the public thinks about you.”
While men
across the new Confederacy joined, regardless of class or privilege and because
it was expected of them, educated young men in the Northeast sometimes had to
contend with parents who believed someone else should do the fighting, perhaps
immigrants.
“There is
more of a choice for Union soldiers. Once you are in the Confederate army there
is no way out,” says Wongsrichanalai, referring to Federal enlistment bounties
and expiration of service.
The U.S.
government eventually turned to the draft as the war wore on.
In his essay, entitled ”What Is a Person Worth at Such a Time”, Wongsrichanalai includes
correspondence from Amherst College student Christopher Pennell to his
father, asking permission to go.
A long war
would require “men who shall fight treason from principle, & not from
desire for spoils, of educated soldiers who understand what they are fighting
for,” wrote Pennell. “Tom Dick & Harry will not be so ready to enlist then.”
Pennell, a
young officer, was killed at the Battle of the Crater in 1864.
Southerners
volunteered to defend slavery and support its expansion westward, to protect their
institutions and to repel invaders, says Wongsrichanalai, a graduate of the
University of Virginia and Bowdoin College in Maine.
Northerners
were concerned about possible failure of the “national experiment” that
followed the American Revolution.
“A lot of motivation is sustaining law and
order, says Wongsrichanalai. “There was a presidential election that was
contested but the Northern candidate won the election. Suddenly, these
Southerners wanted to secede because they lost the election.”
All of those
wearing gray and blue sought to prove their manliness and courage under fire.
Young Confederates |
“The view of
the military (today) is certainly very different,” says the professor. “Since
Vietnam, we have a much more positive view of honoring men, their service and
sacrifice.”
San Angelo is home to veterans and service
members at Goodfellow Air Force Base; Wongsrichanalai hopes they will be among
those attending and taking part in a Q&A at the end of the program.
“This
is a great opportunity to draw on experiences of people who have served in the
military,” he says. “Why they enlisted, what their experiences were with
combat, and how they were engaged in cultural events.”
The
professors want to give students “a sense of the emotional impact of the war.”
Interesting to think about the internal/external differences in sense of duty and honor between the North and South.
ReplyDeleteI guess when you and a group secede, member-of-the-group motivation becomes more prevalent. More morality and loyalty tied to preserving your community rather than perhaps a basic, more universal sense of good vs. evil for the North.