Two South Carolina lawmakers want to
erect a monument on the State House grounds to African-Americans who served the
state as Confederate soldiers. But records show the state never accepted nor
recognized armed African-American soldiers during the Civil War, the State
newspaper reported Saturday. • Article
Saturday, December 30, 2017
Tuesday, December 26, 2017
2017's top 10 Picket posts: Hunley, USS Monitor and a burial a century after death
It’s clear that Picket readers gobble up anything about the H.L. Hunley and USS Monitor. Five
of the blog’s 10 most popular items written in 2017, per Google analytics, were
about the famous Civil War vessels. They were followed by other archaeological
news and a feature on a Federal soldier who was finally buried more than a
century after his death. We wish you all the best in 2018 and thank you for
your abiding interest!
Section of CSS Georgia casemate (USACE) |
10. ROUND TWO OF IRONCLAD RECOVERY: While divers and cranes in 2015 brought up all kinds of cool stuff – including artillery pieces -- from the CSS Georgia site in Savannah, Ga., archaeologists needed to return this year to pluck two giant pieces of protective armor from the river bottom. Julie Morgan of the US Army Corps of Engineers gave a preview. • Read more
Don Scarbrough/Georgia State Parks |
9. ACTION! FILMING RESUMES AT OLD MILL: The New Manchester Manufacturing Co. produced valuable textiles for the Confederacy before Yankee troops burned it during the Atlanta Campaign in 1864. The ruins, the focal point of Sweetwater Creek State Park in Douglas County, Ga., were stabilized this past summer. Tours, weddings and movie and TV filming have resumed in the interior of the brick remains. • Read more
(U.S. Navy) |
8. DIFFERENCES ON HUNLEY LOSS RUN DEEP: Grad student Rachel Lance said she’d solved the mystery about why the first submarine to sink an enemy vessel failed to return to its mission. But the US Navy and those working on the Confederate boat say it’s too soon to come up with a conclusion. • Read more
7. THEY DIG THEIR WORK: Archaeology
students at Georgia Southern University have a compelling laboratory in which
to work – the remains of Camp Lawton, which held 10,000 Federal prisoners in
late 1864. We spoke with project director Ryan McNutt about priorities for this
crop of students. • Read more
McAllister vest (Georgia State Parks) |
5. USS MONITOR TURRET: Once or
twice a year, conservators drain the Union ironclad’s signature artifact so
that they can get inside to do further cleaning and analysis. The plan is to eventually turn the turret right
side up. This post was a preview of the work. • Read more
Stucker ashes (Bob Patrick) |
3. WHAT DOOMED THE HUNLEY: Archaeologists
and historians have long pondered what caused the submarine to disappear in Charleston
Harbor; it could have resulted from a combination of factors. A report issued
earlier this year addressed six leading theories. • Read more
Sections of conserved coat. (Image courtesy of Mariners' Museum) |
2. TRICKY PUZZLE SOLVED: Reassembling a customized sailor’s coat found in pieces in the turret of the USS Monitor proved to be a real challenge. We looked at how the exhaustive conservation project turned out. • Read more
1. SURVEYING GETTSYBURG BATTLEFIELD: This post
previewing archaeological work at Little Round Top and the George Spangler
farm was by far the most popular item of 2017. It went viral, and I am
sheepishly at a loss to fully understand why. But we’ll take it. • Read more
Thursday, December 14, 2017
Recounting Fredericksburg on Facebook live
Four
historians on Wednesday rotated turns in front of a cameraman, providing
play-by-play accounts of the fighting -- strategies, missteps, near misses and
bloody clashes – during the Battle of Fredericksburg 155 years ago. Slaughter
Pen Farm was one of several stops as they hopscotched around the Virginia city as part of a live Facebook video presentation. • Article
Monday, December 11, 2017
Submarine H.L. Hunley: 'Difference of opinion' arises at talk claiming torpedo shock wave killed its 8 crew members
(Courtesy of Friends of the Hunley) |
Rachel Lance made a big splash this summer when her research
on what may have caused the Civil War submarine H.L. Hunley to disappear got national
attention.
Testing and analysis eliminated several theories and
showed the eight crew members were killed by blast injuries caused by the
detonation of their own torpedo, she wrote. Some news coverage had headlines indicating
the mystery of the Confederate vessel’s loss may finally have been settled.
Dr. Lance |
But there’s been pushback, including from the Friends of
the Hunley and the U.S. Navy, which conducted its own tests. One of those experts
challenged Lance’s theory after she spoke Monday in Washington, D.C., about the
first submarine to sink an enemy vessel.
Dr. Lance, who conducted three years of research and tests on a 6-foot scale
model of the 40-foot Confederate sub, detailed her findings at the William G.
McGowan Theater at the National Archives. Research included studying human respiration and the transmission of blast energy.
When the torpedo blew up, sinking the USS Housatonic in
Charleston Harbor, shock waves passed through the iron hull of the sub and
fatally injured the crew, Lance said, reiterating findings she and
others described in a paper published in August. She did the research while a PhD candidate at Duke University.
After the Hunley was raised in 2000, conservators found
the men were still at their stations, indicating there was no rush to escape or
movement to bring air into the boat. There were no obvious physical injuries.
Evidence of blast injuries
Lance said she ruled out suffocation, a “lucky shot” that
brought torrents of water through a hole in the conning tour, and a concussive
force. Rather, she said, it was pressure from the explosion. The torpedo was
still attached to the Hunley by a spar when it was set off.
1/6th scale model used in testing (National Archives YouTube broadcast) |
“The blast does not move you. It does not throw you,” she
said. “It does not break bones. It does not destroy the material of your brain.
That is exactly how the crew was found.”
On Feb. 17, 1864, the Hunley left its
base on Sullivan’s Island and placed its torpedo into the Housatonic, one of
many blockade vessels on the edge of the harbor. Those on board desperately
opened fire on the attackers. Five U.S. sailors were killed in the explosion
and a chaotic scene ensued as other Federal ships came to the rescue. The
Hunley vanished, and there have been many theories – but no proof -- of what
happened to it.
While Lance’s research brought a sense that the mystery
had been solved, the Friends of the Hunley – a part
of the Hunley Project, which was not involved in the new research – was skeptical
and said the matter has not been resolved.
A week after the findings of Lance’s team were released,
the Friends of the Hunley issued a press release that said Lance’s work is
“unsubstantiated.”
“While the likely cause of the
submarine’s demise has not been concluded, the scenario of a concussive wave
killing the Hunley crew has been deemed not likely by those working on the
actual submarine and who have access to this key data,” the organization said.
Lance did not have access to detailed forensic and
structural information about the sub, it said. “As
tempting as it may be, we are careful not to jump to definitive conclusions
until all the research has been evaluated,” Friends executive Kellen Correia
said in the statement.
A difference of opinion
At the Q&A that followed Lance’s
talk Monday, Robert Neyland, who was involved in the recovery of the submarine
and is head of the Naval History and Heritage
Command’s Underwater Archaeology Branch, said there is a "difference of opinion."
Whereas Lance’s team had to use a
smaller test explosive charge because of safety concerns, another team was able
to do a full-scale test of a black powder charge for a 135-pound torpedo,
Neyland said. “We have come up with
different results that counter that.”
Conrad Wise painting of H.L. Hunley (Wikipedia) |
The blast did not cause fatal injuries
to the Hunley crew, he said. “Maybe some heave on the motion of the
submarine, but it would not have injured the crew.”
Lance, who previously worked with Navy civil service,
said she has collaborated with some of the other scientists and agrees with
some of their data. But she said two different theories have incorrectly been
blended in the discussion. She said the other researchers’ project was on the
theory of concussion. “They were not studying the (wave) propagation through
the hull.” That confusion has been used to try to discredit her results, Lance said.
The researcher is a biomedical engineer and has studied
respiratory physiology. She told the audience that one misconception is that a
blast of the type she said killed the Hunley crew would have caused their
bodies to move and show obvious injury.
While her team did not have the money to build a
full-scale model, Lance said, the use of 6-foot scale model CSS Tiny was
sufficient to replicate the impact of the torpedo detonation on the Hunley crew.
The model included ballast tanks and was tested several times in North Carolina ponds.
Lance’s talk was promoted and carried on YouTube by the National Archives, where she found research materials that buttressed her theory.
Navy's study of pressure wave from Housatonic blast |
Several scenarios, or combination, possible
Earlier this year, a
new archaeological
report issued by the U.S. Navy, South Carolina Hunley Commission
and Friends of the Hunley looked at six theories on what might have
happened. Among those are that a Federal vessel hit the sub, the Hunley
submerged and lost oxygen, or the hull was breached.
Those organizations have cautioned that
it could have been a combination of factors that caused the disappearance.
The Navy found the “imparted load” of
the blast to the submarine was “relatively modest.” The primary response
of the Hunley to the
explosion was a rapid vertical motion resulting from the flow of water around
the bubble, it said.
Hole in conning tower has raised questions (Friends of the Hunley) |
While the archaeological report said
there’s a possibility that a “lucky shot” from small arms fire by the
Housatonic crew caused enough damage to a conning tower, leading to its
sinking, Lance disagreed.
Analysis doesn’t show a clean bullet
hole or wide fracturing of the armor from a shot, she said. A study of tides
and currents on that cold, moonlit night showed it took 13-14 minutes for the
sub to drift to where it was found nearly 140 years later. A shot from a single
bullet meant it would take 58 minutes to sink, and the hole that it is evident
on the tower would have caused it to sink in about 5 minutes, she said.
“Why were they not pumping out the water, or trying to
get out of the boat?” Lance said.
Her team also ruled out suffocation.
“The crew had about a 30-minute air supply before they
would have had painful and uncomfortable symptoms from carbon dioxide,” Lance
said. “They made no efforts to try to save themselves or bring air into the
boat.”
And the researchers ruled out the concussion, or blunt
force, theory. There was no sign of skull fractures or other potentially fatal
fractures. “They did not necessarily hit their heads hard enough to cause any
kind of significant trauma.”
Lance also addressed accounts by a lone Housatonic sailor and Confederate battery officer on shore of seeing a blue light coming from the sub, a signal that it succeeded in its mission. She said the sailor had been exposed to miserable conditions in the water while awaiting rescue, a factor that may have affected his recollection.
As for the citing by the Rebel officer, there was no corroboration, no evidence of a signal fire to guide the sub home and the officer was several miles from the sub, meaning he would have had a hard time distinguishing a light, the engineer said.
Lance also addressed accounts by a lone Housatonic sailor and Confederate battery officer on shore of seeing a blue light coming from the sub, a signal that it succeeded in its mission. She said the sailor had been exposed to miserable conditions in the water while awaiting rescue, a factor that may have affected his recollection.
As for the citing by the Rebel officer, there was no corroboration, no evidence of a signal fire to guide the sub home and the officer was several miles from the sub, meaning he would have had a hard time distinguishing a light, the engineer said.
Pressure waves fatal, she says
So that leaves, she said, blast, or wave,
trauma that pushed into the submarine and killed the crew. Such strong pressure
would rupture lungs and damage neurons and blood vessels and cause traumatic
brain injuries that left the organ intact. The brains of the Hunley crew were
found to be intact, she said.
USS Housatonic (Wikipedia -- public domain) |
“It is just pressure waves. …. We are
not saying people are getting hit, just the pressure exposure.”
The Navy has questioned why World War II
submariners survived close depth charges while the Hunley crew did not survive the
torpedo blast. Lance said modern hull armor is much thicker and would have
provided more protection.
Lance said the watch of sub commander
Lt. George Dixon provides further evidence of a traumatic blast. The hands stopped
at 8:23 p.m, the estimated time the torpedo went off.
The audience saw a rendering showing the position of
Dixon’s skeletal remains. It appears the officer’s body was locked in place by
silt that filled the submarine after it sank.
“He seems to have simply been slumped over to the side.
The position of his legs indicate he likely was still sitting on his bench.”
Labels:
blast,
Civil War,
Confederate,
Duke,
H.L. Hunley,
housatonic,
Navy,
Rachel Lance,
sank,
submarine,
trauma
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
At Fort McAllister (Ga.) this weekend: Battle re-enactment and dedication of Rebel officer's personal effects
Federal re-enactors during 2014 event (Courtesy Armory Guards) |
A re-enactment of the victorious Federal assault on Fort
McAllister near Savannah, Ga., will be staged Saturday hours after the
dedication of a case holding items belonging to a Confederate cavalry officer
who helped defend the fort early in the war.
This year’s Winter Muster is set for 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.
(Dec. 9) at Fort McAllister State Park near Richmond Hill. The fort fell
quickly to Federal land forces on Dec. 13, 1864, during the last days of
Sherman’s March to the Sea. In the years before, the fort successfully guarded
the Ogeechee River from naval assaults.
More than 120 re-enactors are signed up for the weekend event,
which will include skirmishes, musket and artillery demonstrations, and
displays of camp life before the 5 p.m. re-enactment.
The day kicks off with a 10 a.m. dedication of the exhibit in the visitor center/museum. The items will join other
displays on the history of the area and the McAllister family, which formerly owned
the land on which the fort was erected.
The collection, which includes a saber,
uniform vest, spurs and a photograph of Joseph Longworth McAllister, were
donated by Carolyn C. Swiggart, an attorney in Greenwich, Conn. The cavalryman
is her fourth great uncle. She will attend the dedication.
McAllister grew up on the Bryan County
rice plantation, where his family owned numerous slaves. He lived in Strathy Hall, just to the west of the fort.
Lt. Col. McAllister's personal efforts (Courtesy Georgia DNR) |
Soon after Confederates
shelled Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor, McAllister was commissioned a captain
of an artillery unit at the fledgling Fort McAllister.
In April 1862, McAllister
formed the Hardwick Mounted Rifles, comprised of volunteers from Bryan County.
The regiment, one of several homegrown units in the Savannah area, helped guard
against Federal invasion of the coast.
The troopers were sent to
Virginia later in the war.
McAllister, 43, died June 11, 1864, at
the Battle of Trevilian
Station, a Confederate victory in central Virginia.
The lieutenant colonel with the 7th Georgia Cavalry fought to
the last, throwing an emptied gun at Federal troops just before he was cut down
by bullets.
Fort McAllister site manager Jason Carter told the Picket
that the addition of the McAllister personal effects will give patrons a more human
connection to what happened during the Civil War.
Swiggart said the state has been an excellent steward of the fort and its history.
“It’s my hope that the items will add to the understanding of who Joseph McAllister was as a person, as well as to bring the reality of war home,” she said. “McAllister was killed in June of 1864, and his loss was immense to his family at Strathy Hall .... Then Sherman's troops wreaked destruction upon this area in December 1864. The war is long over now, but these reminders are important for us as Americans.”
Exhibit ready for Saturday's unveiling (Cheri Hadler/Ga. State Parks) |
Swiggart said the state has been an excellent steward of the fort and its history.
“It’s my hope that the items will add to the understanding of who Joseph McAllister was as a person, as well as to bring the reality of war home,” she said. “McAllister was killed in June of 1864, and his loss was immense to his family at Strathy Hall .... Then Sherman's troops wreaked destruction upon this area in December 1864. The war is long over now, but these reminders are important for us as Americans.”
Admission Saturday is $8 per adult, $5 for youth. Parking passes are not required for event admission.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)